Search results

No need to bother with the FAA then, the rules currently apply to commercial, just avoid no fly zones and don't do anything stupid.

I believe that the best endurance records will be attributed to hydrogen cells.

Are you doing any commercial flying? And I assume your in the US?

Haha, more of a professional rig, but that would have been an impressive shot with a mutirotor then I guess xD. Since when is the GSS C520 truck mounted though, most all GSS are mounted on a helicopter.

http://www.singletracks.com/blog/mtb-videos/must-watch-brandon-semenuks-one-shot-run-is-jaw-dropping/ Just take a look, the filming is impressive, almost as the stunts haha.

I suspect you were up late upgrading it? :P

Sorry I was thinking about the Inspire, not phantom. http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-3/spec http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1112406-REG/hubsan_h109sx4he_h109s_x4_pro_quadcopter.html ^Click specs I would still prefer the Phantom just because the hardware has more support...

https://capolight.wordpress.com/2015/01/14/quadcopter-rotor-duct/

Or like the two kids that thought it was a good enough prank to cover a stop sign and post about it on social media. Two people were killed, they promptly removed the post, but too many people had already seen their moronic act. This is how I feel about people flying near an airport...

Hahaha Well it would probably be simpler to have a big prop and a smaller tail rotor, but at least this is a mutirotor xD.

The media is a very powerful entity, they control what the public see and in doing that they can control what they think. If you run out of stories (that sway public opinion in the direction you want) to report on, just make an old one seem new, and not only have you re-exposed the public to...

Haha, out of the PM and into the "real world" I see. :P I think it has merit for larger camera quads, but I have not had a chance to prototype a (similar design, just like that but with two middle props to make yaw simpler and four smaller ones.) Check your inbox on that PDF I sent...

Haha, you guys do have the best price. Great buy.

You could just solder female connectors onto the FC and have it pretty solder free from then on haha.

The comparison is like an plastic vs a golden apple. Sure it is obvious that one is better, and being better makes it cost more.

I'll stick with hobby grade at that price.

Hahaha, APM is very popular, I'd suggest it or a NAZA for autonomous flight. Here is a list of flight controllers that support waypoint navigation.

Looks like a great design, a lot more like a hobby grade quad.

That looks like they tried to make it designed more after a hobby grade quad, pretty good idea.

Hahaha