For those that are not anti military.

Hi, Bill! Thank you for the great reply! Just quickly, I DID think your original post about the log book was very cool for sure. It was a little bit of my fault for getting carried away with things off topic ;-) As someone in my 40's, I am having a heck of a time reeling in that little Hubsan of mine, but I am loving it LOL! My father-in-law has the Phantom 3, and he loves that quad. I am here hoping to learn about quick, FPV quads. I would appreciate your help for sure (I also now want to buy my father-in-law cool presents!). This seems like a great place to learn about quads. I'm sorry again to jump in here with my "thoughts".

Thank you for your reply and happy flying to all!

-SD
 
Just wanted to second Sky Dogg's response. I can't really put it any better myself and didn't intend to ruffle anyones feathers in here, was just including my two-cents/view of the state of the world.

It helps to know your perspective. I do appreciate the selflessness it takes to put yourself in harms way to protect the people and rights you value. I just don't know that we have a well defined enough enemy or victory conditions in the current case for there to a positive outcome to the "war on terror". For what we should have done I guess my best answer is gather more information and not take a knee jerk reaction of we must bomb people because we have been attacked (or lets go invade Iraq when the people who attacked us aren't even there or tied to the terrorist groups there), I realize the PR for "we're getting more info on who attacked us, why, and what we can do to reduce the risk of it happening again", isn't something the public really wants to hear, but think it would have been a better response.

Also I'm not trying to say the US is the big bad wolf and Iraq (middle east in general) is such a pleasant place to live before the soldiers got there (I know nothing of the region outside of visiting Pakistan once when I was in grade school). Also also, I acknowledge the US foreign aid and going to train and fight on behalf of those who are oppressed by dictators or other highly oppressive regimes can be overall greatly beneficial to the people in a region and the world as a whole. Also also also, the money spent on defense in part gets funneled through DARPA which allows researchers the time and equipment to make advances in technology so I realize money spent isn't necessarily without a financial return or benefit to the public at large.

So apologies if you were only getting the devils advocate version of my view originally, but also have to say none of this is black and white, reality is continuous and gray not discrete. In my view there isn't any good and evil, there is nothing pure and absolute (except that there is nothing pure and absolute :) ).


"The other side, they're just like me in a way. They just don't want be like me in a way, so I guess they're just like me in a way"
 
Thanks for the conciliatory reply. No harm no foul.

One of my favorite axioms is, "50% of the people cannot be wrong 100% of the time". Imagine if 100% of the people believed that.

Have fun!
 
I'm not pro military as I'm sure people here could guess based on other posts, but not against people making the choice to join the armed forces (I did contractor work for the USAF for 3 years after college). Looked up the model of UAS though and doesn't look like this is a strike craft anyway just surveillance which really means more information/intelligence and less likely to erroneously destroy the wrong target. UAS in the military is a mixed bag for sure, it stops us from needing to put "boots on the ground" and putting soldiers in unnecessarily risky situations, but can see it from the other side as "cowardly" sending machines to do your fighting for you (but same argument could be made for any weapon/weapon platform I think, if you don't have the best weapon available it's easy to call your opponent a coward for bringing a gun to a knife fight but you're still the loser in that situation).

https://www.avinc.com/uas/view/raven

Well, I TRIED to join the USAF after high school, but I had trouble convincing the guy that I was older than 10. I was just short of my 18th birthday, but could easily pass for under 12, even in the most embarrassing situations.
 
...Get some muscle memory without having to worry about altitude. But do not use "headless mode" or "IOC". You just end up having to retrain yourself. Go easy go slow.

Interestingly, the only time I have crashed my SJRC F11 is when I switched it over to "headless" mode - tried making a turn and flew it into the side of my house! I don't have a problem with left and right in "normal" mode, but it sure confused me in "headless" mode!
 
The Vietnam War was a fiasco. For many reasons. Most of all due to the politicians..

So, who issued this "kill them all directive"??
 
Back
Top