emansfield
New Member
Newbie question to quad veterans: what is the correct motor number sequence for quadcopters? Or, is there a consistent standard for motor numbering? I have looked at numerous quadcopter related sites and it seems that just about every possible motor numbering scheme is used. For example, Betaflight uses the following numbering: #1 - Right Rear, #2 - Right Front, #3 Left Rear, #4 - Left Front. On a page entitle 'Modeling Vehicle Dynamics – Quadcopter Equations of Motion' (https://charlestytler.com/quadcopter-equations-motion/) the motors are numbered: #1- Right Front, #2 - Left rear, #3 - Left Front, #4 - Right Rear. On the ArduPilot web page (https://ardupilot.org/copter/docs/connect-escs-and-motors.html) the motor numbering is consistent with 'Quadcopter Equations of Motion'. On Quad Zone (https://www.dronezon.com/learn-abou...ellers-and-motors-direction-design-explained/) the numbering is: #1 - Left Front, #2 - Right Front, #3 - Right Rear, #4 - Left Rear.
It appears that there is no consensus about motor numbers and each manufacturer/website is free to choose its own standard, which seems to be a path to general confusion. Is this correct? If so, it means we have to be really careful to understand the motor number protocol in use when configuring flight controllers, etc. Wouldn't it be better for everybody if a standard motor numbering scheme was adopted by everyone dealing with quadcopters (let alone hex- and octocopters?) I suppose the problem there is getting everyone to agree on a standard.
It appears that there is no consensus about motor numbers and each manufacturer/website is free to choose its own standard, which seems to be a path to general confusion. Is this correct? If so, it means we have to be really careful to understand the motor number protocol in use when configuring flight controllers, etc. Wouldn't it be better for everybody if a standard motor numbering scheme was adopted by everyone dealing with quadcopters (let alone hex- and octocopters?) I suppose the problem there is getting everyone to agree on a standard.