Decision making

AussieRob

New Member
Hi Guys, i got into quad rotors a month ago and started off with a latrax alias. This has been a terrific beginner for me. I bought this with 3 batteries and spares instead of the camera. I like the whole idea of sky photography and am planning to upgrade soon as i think i got this down pat. A few quads i have in mind are the following
Dji phantom pro
Yuneec Q500+.

Im liking the features of the Dji quad but the design doesnt really appeal to me.
The Q500 looks more professional but only has a range of 600mtrs

Has anyone had experience with both quads and had a preference to either 1?
 
After watching videos on youtube, the dji appears that it will deliver higher video quality, and like you stated much better distance. The intelligent flight modes are awesome too for the dji.

I was contemplating on a different brand until I seen the distance o_O

I ended up ordering the inspire, but there is not much difference in the p3 pro except the extra remote to control the camera, frame and an hdmi out on the remote which I need to use my headplays.

Hopefully others will chime in with their thoughts too.

Let us know which one you end up getting.
 
Hi Guys, i got into quad rotors a month ago and started off with a latrax alias. This has been a terrific beginner for me. I bought this with 3 batteries and spares instead of the camera. I like the whole idea of sky photography and am planning to upgrade soon as i think i got this down pat. A few quads i have in mind are the following
Dji phantom pro
Yuneec Q500+.

Im liking the features of the Dji quad but the design doesnt really appeal to me.
The Q500 looks more professional but only has a range of 600mtrs

Has anyone had experience with both quads and had a preference to either 1?
You should be able to upgrade the range, it would be harder if the quadcopter is using 802.11 standards instead of a proper standard for this. I'll look into that really quick.
 
You should be able to upgrade the range, it would be harder if the quadcopter is using 802.11 standards instead of a proper standard for this. I'll look into that really quick.
Looks like these use 802.11n. You could extend range with an antenna upgrade, but you might find that that type of range is not always needed.
 
Back
Top